We've all seen the image of Hillary Clinton literally falling into the car when stricken with a case of walking pneumonia, but many have forgotten when Ronald Reagan was shot and took bullet to chest. Kind of does make you wonder just how serious Hillary's health condition may be.
Hillary Clinton is facing a "Catch 22" following her appearance at the 9/11 Memorial yesterday, where she was staggering and on the verge of passing out, or actually passing out in the Van as it swished her away from the scene. Quite obviously the lady from Chappaqua has been having some health issues for the last year. Issues that an obliging staff and an (in the tank) media has tried to minimize.
Hillard did manage to escape a federal indictment in her email scandal, despite her aversion to telling the truth when asked about events surrounding the FBI's investigation. These, and there is no polite way to say it, lies have enforced and codified the believe held by most, that Hillary has a serious "forked tongue" problem. And now with the majority of the country believing that Hillary is less than truthful, she is asking us to accept her word and that of her self-appointed doctor about her medical condition. With her trustworthiness at an all time low, does she really expect anyone (other than her hard-core supporters) to believe her. Hillary has created a Catch 22 (a condition preventing a resolution of a problem). It's no longer about the BleachBit and BlackBerry busting hammers, but of the non-stop flow of lies coming from "Herself", the queen of Chappaqua. Hillary is now facing a dire situation---should she tell the truth about her health, few will believe her; and should she lie (because of her past history) no one will believe her either. A real "CATCH 22"!
When it comes to national Democrats, they are the party of the KKK, the party of slavery, and the modern day task masters of the sprawling black ghettos who keep their chattel in line by offering just enough free stuff to keeping them voting Democrat!
In the not to distant past, people were put on welfare because of the poverty they lived in. Today however, one major political party has learned that by keeping people on welfare they can assure themselves that poverty will continue to exist and that poverty can be used as a political issue.Guess it's a little like the eternal question, "which came first, the Chicken or the Egg"? In today's world does welfare promote poverty, or does poverty promote welfare?